Podcast episode 19: domestic violence- intimate partner terrorism and love: a conversation with social worker, Adele Sheridan-Magro

podcts whit text psdAdele Sheridan-Magro, my guest in this podcast, came to social work later in life. Her first degree in sociology was undertaken in her forties: specialising in women and gender studies. She was particularly taken by post-stucturalism, including the theorists Foucault, Lacan, and the feminist Helene Cixous.

In our conversation Adele described how she faced the challenges of using these perspectives in her social work degree and her subsequent clinical practice.

Adele now has extensive experience in the NGO sector as a specialist domestic violence counsellor, educator, trainer and service coordinator. She has presented on domestic violence at conferences both nationally and internationally,  including the  2015  European Conference on Domestic Violence, held in Belfast.

Adele points to the research that  now makes a compelling case for a direct link between women’s experience of  intimate partner violence and heightened rates of depression, trauma , and self-harm. Critically however, women who are victims of  intimate partner violence, consistently report poor treatment by mental health services. It is clear that the service paradigm is often unhelpful, and profoundly lacking in its recognition of the complex and multilayered trauma experienced by victims of intimate partner violence.

Adele makes the crucial point that communities will have a far greater chance of keeping a child safe if the mother is kept safe.

Our conversation turned to exploring ideas of love, where Adele has been very much influence by queer theory. We go on to discuss how rigid, stereotyped notions of love may carry within them the seeds of oppression.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Podcast episode 18: research and clinical practice in oncology social work- a conversation with Kim Hobbs

podcts whit text psdKim Hobbs has had a long career in oncology social work. She is now a clinical specialist social worker in gynaecological cancer at a large teaching hospital in western Sydney.

Building upon a solid base of clinical care, Kim advocates for improved psychosocial support services for all people with cancer and their families, friends and caregivers. She believes that psychosocial care should be a key component of comprehensive cancer care throughout treatment and recovery.

As a practitioner-researcher she has been involved in collaborative research projects, in psycho-oncology, including highlighting the needs of carers: demonstrating the power of group support: acknowledging and working with sexual issues: and understanding the qualities that leaders need in cancer support groups.

Kim believes that social work has important things to say about our contribution to psycho- oncology. She reminds us that social work caseloads reflect the marginalized and under-served: the disadvantaged, the poor: and the socially isolated.

Her research interests have led to several publications in international peer-reviewed journals, and she has authored and co-authored three chapters in two recently published Australian books.

Our conversation covers her clinical and research career in oncology as well as an illuminating visit to a palliative care service in Denmark.

Her message to medical leaders in the field has been simple; “you did the clever operation, we’re the ones who make their life worth living”.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Podcast episode 17: the power of making art- telling a story in one place- a conversation with art therapy lecturer, Catherine Camden-Pratt

podcts whit text psdDr Catherine Camden Pratt is a Lecturer in Art Therapy in the School of Social Sciences and Psychology at Western Sydney University. Catherine’s clinically-led teaching is informed by her private art therapy practice in which she works mainly with women, children and their families, and also facilitates art therapy groups for Cancer Wellness Support. As well as this, she draws on many years of working with creative arts in education, and in personal and social change.

Catherine is a social ecologist informed by feminism, poststructuralism and critical psychology as ways to open up questions of power and voice.  She locates art therapy performatively as a practice of social justice, and is passionate about making art as a way of knowing and of sharing stories for which there are no words.

She has over 35 years of experience in creative arts-based teaching across a variety of contexts. Her teaching is student-centred and foregrounds critical creativity as a way to enable understandings about ideas of identities as shaped by society, culture and politics.

Her PhD shared the stories of women growing up in families with a mother with a mental illness. Arising from that research she wrote a popular book-   Out of the shadows: daughters growing up with a ‘mad’ mother (Finch, 2006).

She also co-edited the book- Social Ecology: Applying Ecological Understanding to our Lives and our Planet (Hawthorn Press 2011).

Within social work there is a small but growing band of art therapists. In preparation for a podcast conversation with social workers who also are art therapists , I thought it would be useful for me talk to Catherine first, as someone who trains art therapists.

The conversation that emerged was not quite what I had anticipated, as we explored the long and winding road that brought Catherine to her current role.

She honoured me with a very personal account of her journey. She also shared with me her beliefs about what the art therapist brings to the interrelation space – and  through our talk, I gained a better understanding of how art can tell a story in one place, and the powerful therapeutic effect that that might engender.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

The case against AASW constitutional changes: why and how to vote NO

The AASW, in an email broadcast is claiming that this blog post contains “false information” and “alternative facts”. I find this deeply hurtful. I am strongly committed to our code of ethics, social justice and participatory democracy. I will let you be the judge of how just and accurate my views are.

The AASW Board is seeking to change the constitution by putting two resolutions to the AGM. The first resolution bundles up a number of changes. Key elements of the bundle include banishing all reference to the Australian College of Social Work from the constitution and moving it to the bylaws, as well as moving a number of Branch powers and functions to the bylaws. If that resolution passes, the second resolution, abolishing direct member voting for National President and Vice President will also be put to the meeting. For either of these resolutions to be approved they need at least 75% of votes cast.

Abolishing a direct member vote for President and Vice-President
Direct democracy is the wisdom of the crowd. It matters. A direct US Presidential election would have seen Hilary Clinton as President- not Donald Trump.
The Board would have us believe that it is better that they vote annually amongst themselves for a chair and a vice-chair and rebadge this person as the President. This is deal-making behind closed doors.
Our members are entitled to continue to choose their leaders directly.
For a longer discussion of this issue, see my previous post in June.

Why it matters moving the Australian College of Social Work and Branch powers to the by laws
Amending the Constitution is a big deal. It requires a 75% majority of those who voted on the amendment. But changing the bylaws simply requires a majority vote of the Board.
In fact, the AASW changes bylaws routinely- and I cannot remember a single instance over the last few years of a change to bylaws being announced in an e-bulletin. (Happy to be corrected on this!)
No matter what assurances a current Board gives- it has no way of knowing what will happen just a few years into the future.
And so our College is effectively being downgraded from being an integral part of our vision and structure, into something that is nice to have, but could also potentially be abolished tomorrow. I believe that we need the College, and therefore its existence ought to be guaranteed by the Constitution.
Similarly, whilst the Branches survive in the Constitution, they are left hanging by a thread. Capitation, (diverting a proportion of member fees) is gone. The Branches power to raise money is gone. Democratic requirements on voting for Branch Presidents and Management Committees is gone. Delegated authority to act on behalf of the AASW is gone. Contributing to national strategic planning is gone.
How much of this will go into the bylaws? We don’t know. And how much will still be there in a few years time? Nobody knows.
The AASW was originally a federation of state branches. The Branches are a key part of our structure, and if nothing else, their contribution to strategic planning must be guaranteed in our Constitution.

A word on process
I shouldn’t have to be putting these arguments to you on this blog. Even if the AASW is supporting a particular direction, I think it is ethically obliged to publish a range of opinions to support informed decision making.
Only a handful of people participated in the consultation process, making it all the more important that discussion papers canvass the pros and cons of any proposal.
This blog only reaches a few people. The AASW reaches the entire membership.
The amendment abolishing the direct vote of the leadership has been separated out, whilst all the others proposed changes have been bundled into a take it or leave it package. Frankly I find this appalling.

Please take the time to vote against these proposals. You can do this by going to the AGM in Perth on November 9th, or by filling out a form to give your vote by proxy to someone attending the AGM.

POSTSCRIPT  November 2018
As most people now know- this proposal was defeated, with substantial numbers voting against the changes.

As the saying goes, “the world is run by those who show up”. And so I want to thank those members who took the time to vote on the proposed constitutional changes. If you voted yes or no, you “showed up” – and that level of engagement is precious.
I am strongly committed (as I am sure the entire AASW Board is) to encouraging and building on member engagement and participation.

Posted in AASW Policy and Strategy | 7 Comments

Podcast episode 16: universal basic income- fixing inequality and mending our social fabric? An interview with Dr Ben Spies-Butcher

podcts whit text psdThe notion of a universal basic income (UBI) is gaining increasingly favourable attention from both the the left and right of politics. Small and seemingly favourable trials have occurred in some countries. To find out more about UBI I spoke with Dr Ben Spies-Butcher who lectures in Economy and Society in the Department of Sociology at Macquarie University. Ben’s research focuses on the political economy of social policy.

In addition to his academic publications, Ben is a regular contributor to The Conversation. He is also a Research Associate at the Retirement Policy and Research Centre at the University of Auckland, and is a board member of Shelter NSW. He was also the 2017 Glenda Powell National Travelling Fellow for the Australian Association of Gerontology. Ben has written elsewhere that,

Unemployment benefits in Australia have gradually fallen behind the cost of living. The benefit, currently called the Newstart Allowance, is now one of the lowest in the OECD.
This makes it hard to effectively look for work, with devastating consequences for those relying on it. Even business economists have argued it needs to be raised.
Despite this, governments have moved in the opposite direction, shifting more people onto lower and highly conditional payments. This reflects the politics of payments that are very highly targeted.

Our conversation explores the idea of UBI and its relationship to work and social welfare.
Why are we all working so hard when automation was supposed to increase leisure time?
How has the state intervened in regulating both the paid and the unpaid economy?
Why has surveillance and compliance become such a central part of so many people’s work experience?
Why has pay day lending become so profitable? Why does household debt continue to rise?
If there was a UBI would we all just go to the beach and play computer games? Or would it reinvigorate democratic engagement and empower people to leave bad jobs?
How do we convince regional and rural Australians that punitive notions of ‘workfare’ are destructive to our social fabric?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Podcast episode 15: Work- what is it good for? A conversation with Nick Smith, Professor of Philosophy at Macquarie University

podcts whit text psdI sought out Nick Smith for this conversation because of my interest in the future of work. Nick has recently co-authored a book entitled The Return of Work in Critical Theory

According to the blurb,

“The book presents a bold new account of the human significance of work and the human costs of contemporary forms of work organization. A collaboration among experts in philosophy, social theory, and clinical psychology, it brings together empirical research with incisive analysis of the political stakes of contemporary work. The Return of Work in Critical Theory begins by looking in detail at the ways in which work today fails to meet our expectations. It is a lucid diagnosis of the malaise and pathologies of contemporary work and proposes powerful remedies.”

Nick was previously the Director of Macquarie University’s Centre for Research in Social Inclusion from 2003 to 2007 and was Head of the Department of Philosophy from 2008 to 2012.
Nick’s main interest lies in debates in social philosophy concerned with the diagnosis of modern social pathologies. These investigations have also led him to an area of enquiry that could be called the hermeneutics of work: that is -the interpretation of work as a meaningful, self-formative activity.
Sound a bit dry?
Not in the least. Nick and I had a lively conversation that explored some vital questions.
Why is work more stressful, and increasingly robbed of meaning beyond an economic transaction. Why does there seem to be more bureaucracy and more bullying? Why is casualisation on the rise?
Will increasing automation be a blessing or a disaster?
Is a universal basic income a potentially good policy or another symptom of the malaise.

And of course we speculate on what work in a utopian world might look like.

Posted in podcast, Social Policy, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Podcast episode 14: ‘open dialogue’- a potential revolution in mental health care? an interview with Professor Niels Buus

podcts whit text psdThere is growing  dissatisfaction with the care provided by state run mental heath services across the western world.

This forms part of the context  for my conversation with Niels Buus,  the Professor of Mental Health Nursing at the Sydney Nursing School based at St. Vincent’s Hospital  in Sydney, where he is the leader of The Centre for Family-Based Mental Health Care.

Niels has a broad research profile within mental health research, which includes suicide prevention, treatment adherence to antidepressants, clinical supervision of mental health nurses, as well as continuity of care and recovery-oriented health care delivery models.

He is a specialist in ethnographic research methods which can produce nuanced insights into healthcare practices and personal perspectives on health, illness and treatment.

Such approaches are particularly powerful in studies of user-participation in mental health research. As a Scandinavian registered nurse, he is professionally socialized into a strong humanist tradition, emphasizing compassion, openness and equality in healthcare.

In line with this, Niels is engaged in research in the “open dialogue” model of care, and how it could be implemented in Australian healthcare settings.

Niels and I  had an extensive  conversation covering his early training as a nurse, and the clash between custodial and psychotherapeutic models of care.

He also talked about the birth of open dialogue in a small town in Finland and what it looks like in practice.

We discussed how open dialogue sits alongside ‘Big Pharma’, the usual hierarchies of power and knowledge, and the traditional organisation of state services.

You can listen here or subscribe on iTunes or Sticher.

Posted in podcast, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Podcast episode 13: Can Facebook be a vehicle for democracy and social justice? An interview with social worker, Beni McKenzie

podcts whit text psdThis episode is a conversation with Beni Mackenzie one of the founders of the Australian Social Work Changemakers Facebook page.

The page was born of conversations amongst some social workers attending the 2013 AASW National Symposium. The purpose of the page is to provide an online environment for students and qualified social workers in Australia to converse, debate, collaborate and organise.

One of the principle aims of the page is also to contribute to the positioning of social work as the peak social justice profession, and an as important and respected political voice. From small beginnings, it now has over 670 members.

Before Beni got into social work he fuelled his sense of injustice with alcohol, anger and drugs; paradoxically these experiences have held him in good stead in understanding many of the people he now works with.

During our conversation, Beni describes his first social work job in the small outback town of Charleville, working with people affected by drugs and alcohol, and his current work with the homeless in Southport.

We also cover the boundaries and ethics of working in personal and digital space; the contradictions of working in social media designed to make a profit; and the challenges of holding on to horizontal democratic practices in hierarchical organisations.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Podcast episode 12: crisis – what crisis?… an interview with social work academic Shirley Ledger on the place of field education in social work

Shirley Ledger started her working life as an enrolled nurse in a small hospital in rural Queensland. Realising that nursing was not for her she became involved in youth work and domestic violence services. Years later ironically, she found herself back at the same rural hospital as a social work student on placement.

But the focus of our interview was on social work field education.

For some years Shirley has been a university field education co-ordinator. In this role, she was heavily involved in training, curriculum development, supervision liaison, and placement breakdown.

She became deeply interested in academic claims that field education ought to be the “signature pedagogy” of social work. This then has become the work of her PhD in progress.

Lee Shulman, the academic who popularised the term “signature pedagogy”, held that in professional training it comprises the central form of instruction that prepares students for future professional practice.

Consequently, Shirley’s research questions are,

  1. How does the current model of field education connect with the three dimensions (surface, implicit and deep structure) of signature pedagogy?
  2. How does the current model of field education connect with the temporal patterns of signature pedagogy (initial pedagogy, capstone apprenticeships and the sequenced and balanced portfolio)?
  3. How and where are social work programs incorporating the pedagogies of formation, engagement and uncertainty into curriculum design?

This led to a fascinating discussion on a range of issues, including the lack of evidence for the efficacy of current fieldwork practices, questions about the sustainability of current arrangements, and questions about the social justice implications of mandating 1000 hours of unpaid placement, plunging students into poverty and hardship.

And so we dreamt about how necessary changes might be achieved.

Posted in AASW Policy and Strategy, podcast, Uncategorized | 4 Comments

Podcast episode 11: adventures in private practice – an interview with Suzanne Doorakkers-Sprague

podcts whit text psdThis episode is a conversation with Suzanne Doorakkers Sprague, a social worker with a large and thriving private practice in Geelong, where she employs 8 staff in several locations.

Her road to social work was a long one- coming via nursing and psychology. She has also been a counsellor at Alzheimers Australia, as well as working in rehabilitation and in social inclusion services for the elderly. Having lived in Geelong most of her adult life, Suzanne has deep roots in the town.

In a wide ranging interview Suzanne discusses the pleasures, challenges and dilemmas of setting up a practice and a business including; marketing, promotion, networking, setting fees, and handling social media. We discuss the anti business culture that exists in some sections of the social work profession, and how that is now changing.

Posted in podcast, Private Practice | 2 Comments